Tribal Wars - جنگهای قبیله ای

[S a f a 6 4]

مرسی محمد جان
باورت میشه به غلط کردن افتادم؟!
هر چی میگم بابا بیایین اینجا و خودتون درخواست بدین... بچه ها میدن بهتون...
میگن ما حالشو نداریم
صفا جان...
میگم هر موقع احتیاج داشت... بهت میل بزنه... تو هم حداکثر 5 تا براش بفرس (دلیلی داره که میگما... بیشتر نفرست که کچلت میکنه )

باشه بهش بگو که تا خودش میل نزنه دیگه براش ریسورس نمیفرستم

[zauos]

تو ورلد 11 بعید میدونم کسی مثل ایتجا بتونه کمک کنه
چون کلا اقتصاد توی اون ورلد جون نمیگیره!
و اکثرا هم تازه وارد هستن
بعید میدونم کسی فری کمک کنه

بهترین راه دزدین ریسورس های همسایه هاته
من که اقتصادم از همین راه تامین میشه فقط

پس که اینطور
اقا میشه اینو یاد ما هم بدی تا ما هم بزنیم به انبار همسایه ؟
اگه بفهمن چی ؟لابد میریزن سرت اره ؟
الان انبار من هیچی نداره و خالی خالی

[daryoosh22]

Dear Tribal Wars Players,

Due to the large number of people who are still breaking the rules regarding the gifting of villages by sitters we decided it would be a good idea to clarify the rules once more.

The relevant area of the account sitting rule is:

“It is forbidden to give away villages as presents from an account you are sitting (unless it is a trade of villages that clearly benefits both accounts)”

People are continuing to set a sitter to give away villages despite this example in the rules. So to be clear. Under no circumstances can a sitter give villages away from an account they are sitting. If you want to say that a trade has happened then we need to see the sat account gain villages as well from that player.

It is legal for the account owner to gift the villages. If they do this they must send the men away themselves. Under no circumstances should they set a sitter once they have done that. If they do any failure of the sitter to defend the villages will make the whole thing illegal gifting again.

Do not give the password to the account to the person you would have set as a sitter. Doing that to attempt to get around the rules will be treated as an even more serious breach.

We hear the argument a lot that gifting is what the player wanted. That does not impact it being a breach at all. The “best interests” of the sat account for the purposes of the rules involve it staying the same or growing.

Another thing that people misunderstand is that they think that if they send the men away and end the sitting 24 hours later it will be legal for the account to be nobled. The illegal action is the sending of the men away while sitting is active. People nobling villages where a sitter has sent the men away are breaking the gifting rule even after sitting has ended. "cut from the rules: It is forbidden to send suicide attacks from an account you are sitting to clean for other accounts". It is not in the best interest of the account to suicide it's troops.

One other thing we see a lot of with long term sitting is sitters sending the resources from the sat account so their tribemates can fund the nobles and armies needed to take the villages. This is not acting in the best interest of the sat account and additional punishments would be assessed on both ends if this is going on. Recources may only be send out as part of a FAIR trade, everything else in not in the interest of the account.

So what do you do with all those accounts in your tribe where the person set a sitter for a few days and then was never heard from again? Understandably you want them to stay in the tribe. Leave the men in place. End sitting. After a decent interval of not less than 24 hours but hopefully more the rest of the tribe can begin attacking. The sitter must not communicate anything about the villages to the people nobling them. What they know must be kept private and as the sitter has no way not to benefit from information they got while sitting in a case where they ended sitting and the account was not played again they will not be legally allowed to take any themselves. When the villages go abandoned the sitter is free from that constraint though.

Please if you have any questions about whether something you want to do is legal send a ticket into the support system. Our goal is to help you all play legally. We do not enjoy banning people or taking away villages and would much rather answer hundreds of questions about the rules than take away villages so if after all this it still isn't clear please ask!


Please don't forgot, this rule has been put into place to make this game more fun, because after all, fighting is much more fun than sending nobles to empty villages.

Your Tribal Wars Team

[S a f a 6 4]

چرا کسی جواب منو نمیده...
اینجا هم خودمو میزنم..

سئوالت چی بود ؟ بگو شاید بتونم بهت جواب بدم

.................................................. .....................

راستی مصطفی جان من یه پیشنهاد دارم که یه قانون بزاریم که یه حداکثر برای کمک های ریسورسی توش مشخص

شده باشه !!!!

مثلا نهایت کمک 20K باشه ,نظرت چیه ؟

من روند درخواست ها با این روند افزایش پیدا کنه فکر کنم کم بیاریم

[pedram_ashena]

برات 40k از هر کدوم برات فرستادم

پدرام جان کم کم داره ریسورس های درخواستیت یه مقدار سنگین میشه

سعی کن لول منابعت و آپگرید کنی که بتونی کم کم خودت به تنهایی احتیاج هات و برطرف کنی

البته من هنوز هم تمام سعی خودم و میکنم که ریسورس هایی که احتیاج دارید تامین کنم ولی خودتونم باید یکم

رو منابع سرمایه گذاری کنید

آخه بيشتر از اين نميشه.

بيشتر از لول 30 ميشه؟؟؟؟؟؟؟ من هر 3 تا 30 هستند ولي باز هم نميرسم .يايد دنبال شغل دوم باشم.هر چي لولها ميره بالاتر هزينه نگهداري دهكده هم بيشتر ميشود.

من نميدونم شما چطوري ريسورس اضافه مياريد

[Kolang]

Dear Tribal Wars Players,

Due to the large number of people who are still breaking the rules regarding the gifting of villages by sitters we decided it would be a good idea to clarify the rules once more.

The relevant area of the account sitting rule is:

“It is forbidden to give away villages as presents from an account you are sitting (unless it is a trade of villages that clearly benefits both accounts)”

People are continuing to set a sitter to give away villages despite this example in the rules. So to be clear. Under no circumstances can a sitter give villages away from an account they are sitting. If you want to say that a trade has happened then we need to see the sat account gain villages as well from that player.

It is legal for the account owner to gift the villages. If they do this they must send the men away themselves. Under no circumstances should they set a sitter once they have done that. If they do any failure of the sitter to defend the villages will make the whole thing illegal gifting again.

Do not give the password to the account to the person you would have set as a sitter. Doing that to attempt to get around the rules will be treated as an even more serious breach.

We hear the argument a lot that gifting is what the player wanted. That does not impact it being a breach at all. The “best interests” of the sat account for the purposes of the rules involve it staying the same or growing.

Another thing that people misunderstand is that they think that if they send the men away and end the sitting 24 hours later it will be legal for the account to be nobled. The illegal action is the sending of the men away while sitting is active. People nobling villages where a sitter has sent the men away are breaking the gifting rule even after sitting has ended. "cut from the rules: It is forbidden to send suicide attacks from an account you are sitting to clean for other accounts". It is not in the best interest of the account to suicide it's troops.

One other thing we see a lot of with long term sitting is sitters sending the resources from the sat account so their tribemates can fund the nobles and armies needed to take the villages. This is not acting in the best interest of the sat account and additional punishments would be assessed on both ends if this is going on. Recources may only be send out as part of a FAIR trade, everything else in not in the interest of the account.

So what do you do with all those accounts in your tribe where the person set a sitter for a few days and then was never heard from again? Understandably you want them to stay in the tribe. Leave the men in place. End sitting. After a decent interval of not less than 24 hours but hopefully more the rest of the tribe can begin attacking. The sitter must not communicate anything about the villages to the people nobling them. What they know must be kept private and as the sitter has no way not to benefit from information they got while sitting in a case where they ended sitting and the account was not played again they will not be legally allowed to take any themselves. When the villages go abandoned the sitter is free from that constraint though.

Please if you have any questions about whether something you want to do is legal send a ticket into the support system. Our goal is to help you all play legally. We do not enjoy banning people or taking away villages and would much rather answer hundreds of questions about the rules than take away villages so if after all this it still isn't clear please ask!


Please don't forgot, this rule has been put into place to make this game more fun, because after all, fighting is much more fun than sending nobles to empty villages.

Your Tribal Wars Team

این میل که برای همه ارسال شده
زیاد چیزه خاصی نیست
در مورد قوانین اکانت سیتینگ توضیح داده

[mstf666]

سئوالت چی بود ؟ بگو شاید بتونم بهت جواب بدم

.................................................. .....................

راستی مصطفی جان من یه پیشنهاد دارم که یه قانون بزاریم که یه حداکثر برای کمک های ریسورسی توش مشخص

شده باشه !!!!

مثلا نهایت کمک 20K باشه ,نظرت چیه ؟

من روند درخواست ها با این روند افزایش پیدا کنه فکر کنم کم بیاریم

موافقم.
باید بیشتر به افراد تازه وارد ریسورس بدیم که اونا هم مقدار مصرفشون خیلی پایینه.

آخه بيشتر از اين نميشه.

بيشتر از لول 30 ميشه؟؟؟؟؟؟؟ من هر 3 تا 30 هستند ولي باز هم نميرسم .يايد دنبال شغل دوم باشم.هر چي لولها ميره بالاتر هزينه نگهداري دهكده هم بيشتر ميشود.

من نميدونم شما چطوري ريسورس اضافه مياريد

من 12 تا روستا با لول 30 دارن کار میکنن کم میارم.
از کارهای غیر ضروری صرف نظر میکنم تا به بقیه کمک کنم.

[S a f a 6 4]

آخه بيشتر از اين نميشه.

بيشتر از لول 30 ميشه؟؟؟؟؟؟؟ من هر 3 تا 30 هستند ولي باز هم نميرسم .يايد دنبال شغل دوم باشم.هر چي لولها ميره بالاتر هزينه نگهداري دهكده هم بيشتر ميشود.

من نميدونم شما چطوري ريسورس اضافه مياريد

ببین پدرام هر دهکده یه مقدار آپگرید مشخصی داره ,بعد از اتمام آپگرید ها شروع میشه ریسورس ها انبار شدن

وقتی تعداد دهکده هات بیشتر بشه ,تعداد دهکده هایی که آپگرید هاشون تموم شده هم بیشتر میشه

خوب حالا میتونی از ریسورس های اضافه این دهکده ها برای پیشرفت دهکده هایی که تازه گرفتی استفاده کنی

در ضمن احتیاج نیست همه لول ها رو به حد نهاییشون برسونی ,ببین مثلا من دهکده هام اینجوری آپگرید میکنم

وقتی به این مرحله رسیدن دیگه آپگریدشون نمیکنم ,چون دیگه آپگرید فایده ای نداره ,به غیر از اینکه یک مقدار از

جمعیت دهکدت و هدر میده ....

[Kolang]

یه سوال!
این Hiding place رو چرا خراب نمیکنید شماها؟!
مگه نه اینه که تا آخرش که آپگرید بشه... 2000 تا رو مخفی میکنه؟1
این که تقریبا به هیچ دردی نمیخوره!
اصلا برای چی آپگریدش میکنید؟

[S a f a 6 4]

یه سوال!
این Hiding place رو چرا خراب نمیکنید شماها؟!
مگه نه اینه که تا آخرش که آپگرید بشه... 2000 تا رو مخفی میکنه؟1
این که تقریبا به هیچ دردی نمیخوره!
اصلا برای چی آپگریدش میکنید؟

آخه کل ریسورسی که برای آپگریدش تا لول 10 ازمون میخواد خیلی ناچیزه ,در ضمن احتیاج به جمعیت نداره

خوب به نظر من بودنش ضرر نداره