Translation

[Hectorist]

سلام

من یه چند تا Quote داشتم ، میخواستم برام معنی کنید ، البته اگه زحمتی نیست. کم کم میزارم تا راحت تر بشه معنیشون کرد :

I have no problem being with people of different nationalities.

In believing too much in rationality, our contemporaries have lost something.

ممنون

[dariushiraz]

I have no problem being with people of different nationalities.

In believing too much in rationality, our contemporaries have lost something.

من هیچ مشکلی با به سر بردن با مردم با قومیتهای مختلف ندارم.

اعتقاد زیاد به نژاد پرستی باعث از دست دادن خیلی چیزها برای عصر ما شده.

[love-to-learn]

In believing too much in rationality, our contemporaries have lost something

اعتقاد زیاد به نژاد پرستی باعث از دست دادن خیلی چیزها برای عصر ما شده.

سلام

دوست عزيز rationality به معني منطق و منطقي بودن هست و contemporaries به معني معاصران ما است
پس من اينطوري ترجمه مي كنم:
معاصرين ما با اعتقاد زياد به عقلاني و منطقي بودن خيلي چيزها را از دست داده اند.

موفق باشيد

[Hectorist]

مرسی از دوستان بابت این معنی ها. اینم دو تا دیگه :

Do people really want liberty, equality, fraternity? Is it not some manner of speaking?

For me optimism is two lovers walking into the sunset arm in arm. Or maybe into the sunrise - whatever appeals to you.

[love-to-learn]

مرسی از دوستان بابت این معنی ها. اینم دو تا دیگه :

Do people really want liberty, equality, fraternity? Is it not some manner of speaking?

For me optimism is two lovers walking into the sunset arm in arm. Or maybe into the sunrise - whatever appeals to you.

سلام

من اینطوری ترجمه می کنم:

آیا مردم واقعا به دنبال آزادی، برابری و برادری هستند؟ گفتن این حرفها فقط بر حسب عادت نیست؟

از نظر من خوش بینی دو عاشق (و معشوق) که بازو در بازو در غروب آفتاب قدم می زنند است و یا شاید در طلوع آفتاب - هرکدام که شما دوست دارید

موفق باشید

[Hectorist]

مرسی خیلی جالب بود. خوب شد خودم اقدام به معنی کردن اینا نکردم وگرنه چی میشد . اینم دو تا دیگه :

I feel Polish. More specifically, I feel like I'm from the tiny village in the Northeast of Poland where I have a house and where I love to spend time. But I don't work there. I cut wood.”

In ten phrases, the ten commandments express the essential of life. And these three words-liberty, equality, and fraternity-do just as much. Millions of people have died for those ideals.”

[love-to-learn]

مرسی خیلی جالب بود. خوب شد خودم اقدام به معنی کردن اینا نکردم وگرنه چی میشد . اینم دو تا دیگه :

I feel Polish. More specifically, I feel like I'm from the tiny village in the Northeast of Poland where I have a house and where I love to spend time. But I don't work there. I cut wood.”

In ten phrases, the ten commandments express the essential of life. And these three words-liberty, equality, and fraternity-do just as much. Millions of people have died for those ideals.”

دوباره سلام

خواهش میکنم دوست عزیز

حس میکنم لهستانی هستم. دقیقتر اینکه حس میکنم اهل روستای کوچکی در شمال شرقی لهستان جائیکه خانه ای در آنجا دارم و دوست دارم وقتم را آنجا بگذرانم هستم. ولی من آنجا کار نمی کنم. من هیزم شکن هستم.

ده حکم خدا، در ده جمله، بیانگر اساس زندگی هستند و این سه کلمه یعنی آزادی، برابری و برادری به همین اندازه اهمیت دارند. میلیونها نفر بخاطر این آرمانها جان خود را از دست داده اند.

موفق باشید

[مرتضی nvcd]

can you translaite it for me

i use it in p30world with you name.




Selected Responses
[ برای مشاهده لینک ، با نام کاربری خود وارد شوید یا ثبت نام کنید ]
Editor's note: We've received thousands of thoughtful responses, both for and against Pluto's planethood. Here is a representative sampling:
From Prof. Paul Rybski, Chair, Physics, University of Wisconsin-Whitewater:
"I favor the original IAU two-part definition of planet: roundness and Sun-orbiting. Yes, it lets in Ceres and probably Pallas as well as Pluto and Xena -- and who knows what other planets there are to be discovered. But so what? This two-part definition at least eliminates most asteroids and all moons. It adds new worlds to explore to our solar system and could substantially inspire young people to study astronomy. Reducing the number of planets in the solar system would be substantially less inspiring."
from Shana M. Buck, home school teacher:
"Our family (two parents, 8 kids) vote for Pluto to keep its planet status -- for now! But here's a thought: Why did astronomers vote on this now, instead of after New Horizons reaches Pluto? Isn't it kind of -unscientific- to make bold declarations as to whether Pluto is or is not a planet, knowing that a plethora of new scientific data about Pluto and Charon will most likely be on the way back in just 8+ years? I'm glad to see that scientists are just as prone to dumb decision making as the average person."
from Dr. Alan Cayless, chairman of the Stirling Astronomical Society:
"I see no reason why we should not invoke the principle of Grandfather Rights. In effect, this says that when a rule is tightened or reviewed, that people (or in this case, planets) who qualified under the old system are allowed to retain their existing status, even if they would not qualify under the new rules. A good example is when planning regulations for buildings are changed: new buildings have to conform to the new, tighter, regulations - but older buildings constructed under previous rules are allowed to stand: they don't have to be demolished simply because they don't comply with the new rules. Grandfather Rights would allow Pluto to retain its 76-year-old status as a planet, whilst avoiding the problem of having to add others such as Sedna. There is plenty of precedent for this in science: electrons still have a negative charge, planetary nebulae are still called 'planetary' nebulae, even though they have nothing to do with planets. I hope the IAU will consider this seriously, as a practical and workable compromise."
from 5th grade teacher Pidge Wingert and her Gifted Students in Albequerque, New Mexico
"We think that the decision shouldn't be left to the public but decided by the scientists who have studied the planets for years. We, as a class, disagree amongst ourselves about Pluto being a planet; we are divided 50-50."
from Dr. Paul Richardson, a family doctor and amateur astronomer
"The arguments of the IAU are irrefutable. Pluto is a big member of a group of many objects, and should never have been classified as a planet - although the reasons it was are fully understandable within their time. If schoolkids want a planet to call their own, they should adopt Mercury--much more exciting than sluggish Pluto from which the sun looks like a bright star."
from John Chumack, astrophotographer
"Four percent of the astronomical community is not enough for a decision this big. It has many public, historical, and scientific ramifications. This should be decided by the people of the world as well, not just scientists."
from James N. Head, JPL Solar System Ambassador - Contra Costa County area
"Making Pluto a minor or dwarf planet enhances our understanding of our Solar System. So along with Ceres, and "Xena", and the asteroid belt, and the Kuiper belt, and the Ort cloud, the Solar System is seen as a more complex structure, more elegant, more sophisticated, and our experience is enriched. If, on the other hand, we make Pluto a planet, then dozens of other planets will be added. It will be a mess - what child is going to remember thirty planet names--or hundreds?"
from Leigh Palmer, Professor Emeritus, Department of Physics, Simon Fraser University
"Pluto is a planet in our (Euroamerican) culture. In the last cultural shift of this nature the Sun was promoted from planet to the center of the universe, the Moon lost its planetary status and Earth was demoted to planetary status. There were good scientific reasons for these changes. It would be an example of extreme conceit for the IAU to assert it is capable of effecting a cultural shift of comparable magnitude for a trivial nonscientific reason."
This page is under construction. Come back tomorrow for more responses. --Dr. Tony Phillips
PlutoPetition.com

[chevalier]

البته این تعدادی اصطلاح مربوط به موسیقی داره که من نمی فهمم ولی آنچه رو که می فهمم می نویسم.

«ام کلثوم» در جهان عرب به عنوان یکی از بزرگترین خوانندگان و موسیقی دانانی که تا کنون زیسته اند شناخته می شود. به دشواری می توان گستره صوتی او را اندازه گرفت، چرا که اکثر ترانه های او به صورت اجرای زنده ضبط می شدند و او آگاه بود که بعداً روی موسیقی ضبط شده اصلاحاتی صورت می گرفت و لذا از تمام توان خود استفاده نمی کرد. می دانیم که او قادر بود حتی در اکتاو دوم که خیلی کم محسوب می شود بخواند و همچنین در دوران اوج خود می توانست در اکتاوهای بالای 7 و 8 نیز بخواند، هر چند در انتهای دوران کارش هنوز می توانست در گستره بیش از دو اکتاو آواز بخواند.

یک دنیا متشکر مندم
اما یه سوئال خیلی تخصصی دیگه:

Her remarkable ability to produce approximately 14,000 vibrations per second with her vocal chords, her unparallelled vocal strength (no commercial microphone utilized for singing could withstand its strength, forcing her to stand at a 1-3 meter radius away from one),

[The_matrix]

سلام
کسی میتونه این پی دی اف 270 کیلوبایتی رو برام ترجمه کنه؟؟
لینکش

برای مشاهده محتوا ، لطفا وارد شوید یا ثبت نام کنید