اینترنت استان آذربایجان غربی

[IVAN]

سلام به همه همشهری های گل
من میخوام یه مودم وایرلس بخرم تو بین مدل های مختلف مدل TD-W8901G‎ تی پی لینک رو انتخاب کردم به نظرتون خوبه ؟ تو این رنج قیمت بهتر از این میتونم انتخاب داشته باشم ؟

مودم خوبیه ولی وایرلسش سری g هست . بهتر از این، D-Link 2730U هست که وایرلسش آخرین استاندارده (n ) قیمتشون هم تقریبا یکی هست (حدودا 3-4 تومن شاید بیشتر بشه)

[urumchi]

سلام به همه همشهری های گل
من میخوام یه مودم وایرلس بخرم تو بین مدل های مختلف مدل TD-W8901G‎ تی پی لینک رو انتخاب کردم به نظرتون خوبه ؟ تو این رنج قیمت بهتر از این میتونم انتخاب داشته باشم ؟

بنظر من asus بهتر از tplink ــه ولی چون گرونتره نمیدونم بودجه ت اجازه میده تهیه ش کنی یا نه، مثل مدلهای N11 یا N10

اگر هم نمیخوای بیشتر هزینه کنی SMC7904 و Asus AM604G هم گزینه های مناسبی هستند

مشحصات فنی SMC7904 :

سازگاری با تکتولوژی های ADSL و +ADSL2
802.11b/g Access Point
4 پورت شبکه
مشحصه های تنظیماتی : NAT , Firewall , ACL , VPN
پشتیبانی از : WPA2 , 802.1 x
Dual SSID
8 VLAN

ساعت 12 شب

C:\Users\SMN>ping 4.2.2.4

Pinging 4.2.2.4 with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 4.2.2.4: bytes=32 time=203ms TTL=239
Reply from 4.2.2.4: bytes=32 time=202ms TTL=239
Reply from 4.2.2.4: bytes=32 time=202ms TTL=239
Reply from 4.2.2.4: bytes=32 time=203ms TTL=239

Ping statistics for 4.2.2.4:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 202ms, Maximum = 203ms, Average = 202ms

C:\Users\SMN>ping google.com

Pinging google.com [209.85.147.105] with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 209.85.147.105: bytes=32 time=223ms TTL=48
Reply from 209.85.147.105: bytes=32 time=222ms TTL=48
Reply from 209.85.147.105: bytes=32 time=223ms TTL=48
Reply from 209.85.147.105: bytes=32 time=222ms TTL=48

Ping statistics for 209.85.147.105:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 222ms, Maximum = 223ms, Average = 222ms

C:\Users\SMN>ping tabnak.ir

Pinging tabnak.ir [87.107.68.98] with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 87.107.68.98: bytes=32 time=48ms TTL=54
Reply from 87.107.68.98: bytes=32 time=48ms TTL=54
Reply from 87.107.68.98: bytes=32 time=48ms TTL=54
Reply from 87.107.68.98: bytes=32 time=48ms TTL=54

Ping statistics for 87.107.68.98:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 48ms, Maximum = 48ms, Average = 48ms

C:\Users\SMN>ping forum.p30world.com

Pinging forum.p30world.com [72.55.140.181] with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 72.55.140.181: bytes=32 time=261ms TTL=46
Reply from 72.55.140.181: bytes=32 time=261ms TTL=46
Reply from 72.55.140.181: bytes=32 time=259ms TTL=46
Reply from 72.55.140.181: bytes=32 time=260ms TTL=46

Ping statistics for 72.55.140.181:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 259ms, Maximum = 261ms, Average = 260ms

C:\Users\SMN>ping yahoo.com

Pinging yahoo.com [209.191.122.70] with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 209.191.122.70: bytes=32 time=324ms TTL=46
Reply from 209.191.122.70: bytes=32 time=324ms TTL=46
Reply from 209.191.122.70: bytes=32 time=326ms TTL=45
Reply from 209.191.122.70: bytes=32 time=326ms TTL=45

Ping statistics for 209.191.122.70:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 324ms, Maximum = 326ms, Average = 325ms

C:\Users\SMN>ping hipfile.com

Pinging hipfile.com [46.105.156.242] with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 46.105.156.242: bytes=32 time=189ms TTL=52
Reply from 46.105.156.242: bytes=32 time=188ms TTL=52
Reply from 46.105.156.242: bytes=32 time=189ms TTL=52
Reply from 46.105.156.242: bytes=32 time=189ms TTL=52

Ping statistics for 46.105.156.242:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 188ms, Maximum = 189ms, Average = 188ms

[ittools]

ممنون از دوستان اطلاعاتتون خیلی به روزه . فردا برم ببینم میتونم این مودم ها رو پیدا کنم

[fanoostalaei]

---------- Post added at 09:37 AM ---------- Previous post was at 09:34 AM ----------

Microsoft Windows [Version 6.1.7600]
Copyright (c) 2009 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
C:\Users\GOD>ping 4.2.2.4
Pinging 4.2.2.4 with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 4.2.2.4: bytes=32 time=123ms TTL=242
Reply from 4.2.2.4: bytes=32 time=123ms TTL=242
Reply from 4.2.2.4: bytes=32 time=125ms TTL=242
Reply from 4.2.2.4: bytes=32 time=123ms TTL=242
Ping statistics for 4.2.2.4:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 123ms, Maximum = 125ms, Average = 123ms
C:\Users\GOD>ping yahoo.com
Pinging yahoo.com [209.191.122.70] with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 209.191.122.70: bytes=32 time=259ms TTL=51
Reply from 209.191.122.70: bytes=32 time=261ms TTL=51
Reply from 209.191.122.70: bytes=32 time=260ms TTL=51
Reply from 209.191.122.70: bytes=32 time=261ms TTL=51
Ping statistics for 209.191.122.70:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 259ms, Maximum = 261ms, Average = 260ms
C:\Users\GOD>ping google.com
Pinging google.com [173.194.35.212] with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 173.194.35.212: bytes=32 time=164ms TTL=53
Reply from 173.194.35.212: bytes=32 time=164ms TTL=53
Reply from 173.194.35.212: bytes=32 time=165ms TTL=53
Reply from 173.194.35.212: bytes=32 time=164ms TTL=53
Ping statistics for 173.194.35.212:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 164ms, Maximum = 165ms, Average = 164ms
C:\Users\GOD>ping hipfile.com
Pinging hipfile.com [46.105.156.242] with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 46.105.156.242: bytes=32 time=277ms TTL=52
Reply from 46.105.156.242: bytes=32 time=277ms TTL=52
Reply from 46.105.156.242: bytes=32 time=276ms TTL=52
Reply from 46.105.156.242: bytes=32 time=278ms TTL=52
Ping statistics for 46.105.156.242:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 276ms, Maximum = 278ms, Average = 277ms
C:\Users\GOD>ping forum.p30world.com
Pinging forum.p30world.com [72.55.140.181] with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 72.55.140.181: bytes=32 time=223ms TTL=47
Reply from 72.55.140.181: bytes=32 time=225ms TTL=47
Reply from 72.55.140.181: bytes=32 time=223ms TTL=47
Reply from 72.55.140.181: bytes=32 time=223ms TTL=47
Ping statistics for 72.55.140.181:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 223ms, Maximum = 225ms, Average = 223ms
C:\Users\GOD>ping tabnak.ir
Pinging tabnak.ir [87.107.68.98] with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 87.107.68.98: bytes=32 time=51ms TTL=51
Reply from 87.107.68.98: bytes=32 time=48ms TTL=51
Reply from 87.107.68.98: bytes=32 time=47ms TTL=51
Reply from 87.107.68.98: bytes=32 time=47ms TTL=51
Ping statistics for 87.107.68.98:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 47ms, Maximum = 51ms, Average = 48ms
C:\Users\GOD>

---------- Post added at 09:40 AM ---------- Previous post was at 09:37 AM ----------

بابا سعید حوصله داری ها 2 ساعت میای پینگ تست هاتو مرتب میکنی
من هم خواستم این کارو بکنم حوصلم نکشید

[x8800]

حسین الان کانکشنمو کردم دستی . 1000 بار من دیس کردم ولی باز 46 داد

انگار باید با پینگ زیر 200 وداع گفت

[fanoostalaei]

راستی ناصر الان چک کردم دیدم پینگ تو 49 با گوگل 145 و با 109 170 هست در ضمن فرقشون خیلی کم شده

حداکثر باهم 50 تا تفاوت دارن نمیدونم برای تو هم اینجوریه یا نه

[x8800]

مال من با 46 گوگل و 4224 بالای 300 میده !

[fanoostalaei]

---------- Post added at 07:54 PM ---------- Previous post was at 07:51 PM ----------

[x8800]

وضعیت نویزمم خوبه . خدا لعنت کنه مدیر این مکس نتو . تو استان ما بدجور داره کلاه برداری میکنه !

[fanoostalaei]