ali_dubai
13-08-2006, 10:45
با سلام دوستان خوبم
یکی از رفقای من در کار برنامه نویسی میباشد و میخواهد که بهترین قفل نرم افزاری خارجی کدامند تا آنرا بخرد
و اگر هم لینکی از آنها دارید بگذارید ممنون میشوم
با تشکر فراوان
peyman khatar
13-08-2006, 16:00
هترین قفل های نرم افزاری خارجی کدامند ؟
با سلام دوستان خوبم
یکی از رفقای من در کار برنامه نویسی میباشد و میخواهد که بهترین قفل نرم افزاری خارجی کدامند تا آنرا بخرد
و اگر هم لینکی از آنها دارید بگذارید ممنون میشوم
با تشکر فراوان
سلام
قفل هاي خارجي كه رايگان نيستند تا دانلود كني عزيزم ...
بنظر من بهترين قفل نسخه جديد استارفورس ... ؟؟؟
persiankitty
13-08-2006, 16:07
با سلام دوستان خوبم
یکی از رفقای من در کار برنامه نویسی میباشد و میخواهد که بهترین قفل نرم افزاری خارجی کدامند تا آنرا بخرد
و اگر هم لینکی از آنها دارید بگذارید ممنون میشوم
با تشکر فراوان
هيچ كدام بدرد دوست شما نميخورند.
اولا : قفل هاي خارجي با افرادي سروكله مي زنند كه از نظر حرفه اي سوادشان خيلي بالاتر از مدعيان موجود در ايران هستند. يعني امكان اينكه يك قفل خارجي توسط يك خارجي كرك شود خيلي زياد است.
دوما : قفل هاي خارجي همواره در چرخه استفاده در خارج از كشور هستند بنابراين زمان كوتاهتري براي پيدا شدن راه حل آنها لازم است.
سوما : قيمت قفل هاي خارجي بالاست
چهارما : امكان دستيابي به بخش پشتيباني در قفل هاي خارجي فقط توسط ايميل هست اما قفلهاي داخلي راههاي بهتري دارند. شما مي توانيد نويسنده قفل را داخل گوني انداخته و به محل كارتان ببريد.
پنجما : قفل تويسهاي خارجي استعداد مادرزادي ندارند يك عده Baboo گلابي هستند كه گنجشك رنگ شده مي فروشند. قفلهايشان هم چنگي به دل نمي زند. بايد به برنامه نويسهاي ايراني آفرين گفت.
ششما : قفل نويسهاي خارجي بازار داخل كشور را نمي شناسند.
حالا اگر دوست داشتيد قفل خارجكي گران بگذاريد :
1- StarForce
2- CD-Cops
3- HexaLock
را تست كنيد ( به همين اولويتي كه نوشتم )
StarForce or Hexalock?
Author: Dmitriy pankrat'ev
By the purpose of this article is the comparison of the degree of the vulnerability of two systems for protection CD from unsanctioned copying - extended StarForce and "widely known in the small circles" Hexalock. In the article not it will be given any recommendations regarding circuit and breaking of these systems, but will be produced the analysis of their stability to the existing methods of copying the protected disks.
According to the data which there is in the Internet, both systems ensure the approximately identical degree of protection. However, the methods of circuit StarForce it is easy to find, they are sufficiently clearly described and have a good repetition of results. The deep search for the methods of breaking Hexalock of intelligible results did not give (this does not mean, of course, that them there does not exist), with exception of several purely speculative recommendations.
Partly this is explained by the policy of the use of protective systems and by their directivity. The spheres of the application of these systems essentially are distinguished. StarForce widely is used on the consumer market for the protection of play and mul'timediynykh disks, Hexalock in- basic adapts in the special projects. Hexalock announces its technology for the application first of all in the military, government, medical and bank spheres. The list of the play programs, protected StarForce, contains several ten designations, analogous list for Hexalock - only unit. Accordingly, the forces, directed toward the breaking of systems, also essentially are distinguished, in any case, it is quantitative. It is completely probable that data on breaking Hexalock either are so special that they do not represent interest for the wide public or simply they do not manage to be extended in view of the specific character of the protected projects.
Let us briefly examine the bases of data of the systems of protection and advantage and deficiencies in their practical realization.
System StarForce is based on the tying to the physical structure of spiral path (measurement of the angle between the sectors) and the use of additional low-level means of protection. The installation of the drivers of protection, which occurs with the first starting of application, is key moment in tuning of system.
For creating the protection StarForce it is necessary to transmit on the server of company all necessary usable files in the open (neupakovannom and neshifrovannom) form. Thus, company actually becomes the possessor of the open copies of all products, sometimes given to it for the protection. It does not be worthwhile to explain the potential danger of this fact for the producer PO.
For the connection to the server of protection with the use of a fire wall it is necessary to open the port of remote access to 27705, that, in the general, the stabilities does not increase network. The last versions StarForce deeply take root into Windows and even is modified its nucleus, as a result of which the operational stability of system considerably deteriorates. After the removal of the protected programs the position changes little, since StarForce automatically completely is not moved away. The developers of system are wonderfully informed about this and give you very to bring system into order, using special utility.
Should be noted also the important fact, which does not for some reason be reflected in the accessible sources that with the start in system StarForce of the support of that of still very extended Windows'98 the application not will have antis-emulation, i.e., the degree of its protection catastrophically decreases. Furthermore, as communicates in the fresh distribution of the news of the very StarForce from 28.07.06, anti-emulation did not work also in some versions under control Windows Vista. Errors are corrected only now. Consequently, many program products, which use StarForce, prove to be defenseless upon simple transfer to the newest operating system.
The principle of operation Hexalock of the 4th generation is based on the use of so-called virtual digital hologram (VDH). This is faster beautiful means, than concrete physical or technological concept. The discussion deals with reporting of the fact of the loss of the important part of the information during the removal of the copy of disk to the end user. The protected means of disk Hexalock is created with the aid of the program, free of charge obtained from the site of producer. However, for the circulation is also necessary the presence of the special disks Cd -rx, which contain the prekompilirovannuyu session with the elements of the protection, to which tie basic files in the process of record.
The operating speed of systems noticeably is distinguished. With each starting of StarForce it spends one-two minutes on checking of disk. For Hexalock'a this time is approximately equal to the time of the load of the protected application.
Now strictly about the stability of the systems to the existing methods of the circuit of the protection of disks in question.
As is known, the most common method for removing the protection StarForce of any versions is the use of well recommended itself copyist Alcohol 120% with the subsequent load of the obtained means into virtual Cd- rum in the combination either with some sufficiently elementary for the moved user mechanical operations or with the use of additional PO. Details here concern not we will be. Process itself it is sufficiently prolonged (from several it is hour to days and more) and it requires preparation level, sufficient at least in order to follow the represented recommendations.
Is possible the use also of other program products, for example, CloneccD or more exotic GameJack. Result, as a rule, is repeated and it completely corresponds to expectations.
Since straight recommendations regarding the breaking of system Hexalock not it was discovered, contributor first undertook attempts at the removal of protection "into the forehead", with the aid of different (practically all accessible) programs, intended for the copying protected CD.
1) the method, described above, with ustanovke/sbrose of additional options in different reasonable combinations (reading sub-channel data, positioning the region of the data DPM, and other.) results it did not give. However, immediately appeared two moments, that have positive value. First, the determination of the presence of two tracks, what, however, it was to be expected, since the additional track on Cd -rx was visible with the unarmed view at a distance of approximately 20 mm from the center of disk. Its capacity is approximately 4.5 mb.. In the second place, the presence at the end of this track of the nechitayemykh sectors (with numbers 2218... 2221), which be present on all protected disks and, obviously, they are the integral part of protection Hexalock. Start of the option of the extended scanning of sectors gives effect not with what parameters. By the way, the first fact makes it possible to immediately exclude from the set of instruments useful utilities of the type UltraISO, which work with standard ISO- means.
2) the powerful copyist BlindWrite (versions 5 and 6) with the declared possibility of bit-by-bit copying in this case proved to be also it was useless both in the case of the direct copying of disk to analogous Cd -rx, not to mention usual Cd- r and in the case of creating the means of disk and load of the latter into the virtual drive with the aid of the known fitter- emulator DAEMON Tools in any regime of emulation (only for BlindWrite 5, since the means, taken by the 6th version of this program, unfortunately, by fitters yet they are not supported). By the way, the bit-by-bit copying CD (any) is impossible physically, according to the very principle of record; therefore to the statements about the realization of this possibility one should relate, at least, with the caution. Very process of copying disks Hexalock is started only with tuning of profile Bad Sectors, obviously, for the same reason for the presence of the nechitayemykh sectors on the first track.
3) completely also is matter also concerning the, perhaps, well-known copyist himself CloneccD. The versions of tuning in this program not too it is much, and sorting to the desired result does not lead all possible. However, the file of size ccd already it is possible to open in the editor of means CDmage B5, that has many useful functions, for example, the functions of search and restoration of the damaged sectors, import and extraction of sectors is file, which makes this program of similar to UltraISO, however, with the valuable possibility of work with the mul'titrekovymi disks. However, this editor makes the presence of the built-in checker of contents of sectors on the bytes with unique. Here we can get the information about the regime of record, the size of sector, beginning and end of the tracks and, etc.
4) the means of disk Hexalock, created with the aid of Nero 6, is incapable it will load into the "native" emulator Ahead Nero, and being it is installed into the virtual drive DAEMON Tools, it issues the expected requirement of original disk.
5) were tested the popular managers of the virtual disks FarStone VirtualDrive 7 and Paragon CD Emulator 3.0. Both of them successfully created the means of disk, with which also could not be worked. The second proposing to produce copying the mul'titrekovogo disk Hexalock only in size CloneccD. The means of disk VirtualDrive also can be opened in editor CDmage B5.
6) the protection of disk not was discovered by copyist GameJack 5, who also has the appropriate detector. This product, to the view of the author, is the excellent alternative Alcohol 120%. Nevertheless, protection Hexalock proved to be tough nut, also, for it.
7) unique convenient shell for all enumerated copyists (Alcohol 120%, CloneccD, BlindWrite and GameJack) is Alcoholer. Is today accessible version 4.1 of this program. In it the functions of the detector of the system of protection and control of the programs of copying disks successfully are combined. The options of control are established on the expanded panel and the starting of necessary copyist is achieved in accordance with these tuning. In list Alcoholer'a it is more than 30- TI of the protective systems, including the long-suffering StarForce, but, unfortunately, precisely, Hexalock among them it is absent. Alcoholer is intended for the work in the integration with detector ClonyXXL.
8) generally, the determination of the very fact of the presence of protection Hexalock proved to be exceptionally complex problem practically for all tools. Besides those enumerated, they were used: ClonyXXL, and, of course, PEiD and PE-Tools - is already for the analysis of separate of those protected file. Of all tools only latter showed the presence of protection, identifying it as Xtreme-Protector v1.05. of any differences in the structure was file, located on the original disk and on the copy, it is not discovered with the aid of the enumerated programs. Differences, naturally, appear in the dumps it is file, neglected to the fulfillment.
Was noted, by the way, interesting fact. It is natural that the starting of virtual copy occurred successfully, if in this case original disk find in the drive. But original disk in exactly the same manner rejected to be started with the initially loaded means!
Thus, from entire that state aboved it follows that the utilized in practice, extended methods of the circuit of protection StarForce in principle are unfit for the breaking of system Hexalock. It is obvious that for this must be used the more thinned methods, which unambiguously require the knowledge of assembler and application of debaggerov, which substantially increases the complexity of removing the protection. Should be considered the much smaller interest in this, at least, as a rule, because of the absence of straight line and immediate material benefit.
سو داجان ايني كه گفتي يعني چه [ برای مشاهده لینک ، لطفا با نام کاربری خود وارد شوید یا ثبت نام کنید ] ([ برای مشاهده لینک ، لطفا با نام کاربری خود وارد شوید یا ثبت نام کنید ])
persiankitty
14-08-2006, 10:08
StarForce or Hexalock?
Author: Dmitriy pankrat'ev
By the purpose of this article is the comparison of the degree of the vulnerability of two systems for protection CD from unsanctioned copying - extended StarForce and "widely known in the small circles" Hexalock.
مثل اينكه يك طرفدار استقلال بياد و بگه من ميخوام يك مقايسه اي بين استقلال و پرسپوليس بكنم.
من كه فكر ميكنم اين مقايسه مغرضانه است و خوب هگزالاك هم كه اصل مال اسراييليه و مشخصه كه از چه سيستمي براي بازاريابي استفاده ميكنه.
اما بد نيست اگر برامون بگي كه اين متن رو از كجا آوردي .
vBulletin , Copyright ©2000-2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
مشاهده نسخه کامل
: